Review: Checkster

checkster_logoReview: Checkster

Four years into the process, Yves Lemursi is a smooth spokesman for his gift to reference checking, Checkster. After graduating from Taleo (where he was on the ground floor and built much of their research business), Lemursi starting fermenting the idea that was to become Checkster. After 18 months in product development and 30 months of trench level selling , it looks like Yves just might have changed the way that things get done.

Mill Valley, CA, where Yves houses Checkster’s Global Headquarters is an interesting place. Home to aging rock stars, famous writers and middle aged trust fund babies, the town has been a an artist’s colony for many years. It’s often the case that a newly minted rock star will buy a house in Mill Valley as a platform from which to build a second hit album. That’s why the streets of town are full of one hit wonders.

One hit wonders are those hi-pos with an astonishing initial track record who fail to live up to their supposed potential. It’s the norm. The number of musicians who create real legacies are few and far between Talent gets you a paying gig. The big time involves talent, luck and a sense of timing. Predicating the next big hit has it’s safest bet in the one hit wonders. There’s always a record company that will bet on lightning striking twice.

That’s the basic theory of reference checking – if they did well in their last job, they’ll do well in the next one. If they had one hit, they’re most likely good for another. Our fundamental understanding of the relationship between a person and a job is so primitive that that’s the best we can do.

It’s possible, I suppose, to do a thorough enough background check to minimize the risk of hiring someone. Until the advent of Checkster, it just seemed too hard. Generally, people don’t want to ‘rat out’ their friends; there is a ton of misinformation about the legal consequences of a frank reference; it’s generally scary; it takes a ton of time; the results are good for screening people out but less impressive for screening them in.

Certainly you don’t want a pedophile running the local day care center. Convicted embezzlers make bad CFOs. Really cranky political extremists probably don’t belong in liaison jobs. Sociopaths shouldn’t be CEOs (well, maybe not so much on that one).

Unfortunately, raw criminal checks don’t turn up everything you’d like to know. Somewhere, between the bet that history repeats itself and the fact that birds of a feather flock together lies the information you need for hiring decisions. Checkster mines the information by appealing to crowdsourcing as a basic model of intelligence.

Checkster radically reduces the cost of reference checking while dramatically improving its effectiveness. Rather than spending a perfunctory 90 minutes chasing down dead ends, the recruiter asks the prospective employee to invite a dozen or so people to give brief Checkster references. The results are collected, annotated and delivered in a substantive, easy to understand report.

From awful, time consuming chore to easy to execute value added service is an extreme transformation. As an added bonus, the references become part of your passive candidate pipeline. (That’s what the big league search firms do).

Checkster merits your attention. Crowdsourced reference checking will be the way that things get done four or five years from now. Easier, faster better, cheaper, smarter.

This entry was posted in Reviews. Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.
  • Sponsor

    Get your copy of HRExaminer's White Paper on 5 Scenarios for the Future of Recruiting

3 Comments

  1. Posted July 2, 2010 at 2:56 pm | Permalink

    Have you read Checkster’s terms and conditions and privacy policy? I was asked to register with them today in order to proceed with an offer process. I’m concerned about a number of the clauses, particularly giving them the right to publish and republish information obtained by people I may not even know, which may be defamatory, libelous, slanderous and false. It allows the service to terminate my access at any time for a wide variety reasons, including mere suspicion that information provided is not appropriate or current. I’d have to indemnify them fully and waive any/all rights I have. The privacy policy says they collect purchase history, browsing history, search history, registration history, and sell it in aggregate to 3rd parties. I’m not a lawyer, but I feel like I’d need one before agreeing to it.

  2. Posted July 13, 2010 at 1:44 pm | Permalink

    Peter,

    As a Job seeker you can indeed sometimes feel that the employers are covering themselves too much, but the terms that Checkster has are industry standard.

  3. John
    Posted August 14, 2010 at 10:05 pm | Permalink

    As a job seeker, I found a major problem with Checkster:

    I have worked exclusively for major corporations. The strict policy of these corporations is that NO employee is allowed to provide professional references except for the HR department.

    References who might (and have in the past) allowed for a brief phone conversation, even if providing honest, accurate feedback to a prospective employer- might (and some did for me) balk at anything remotely official that can be traced back to them for fear of being terminated. Checkster is basically asking them to sign an official document proving they violated policy.

    Of course HR themselves will typically only give out the following information: dates of employment, position held, salary (if the employee authorizes ahead of time) and perhaps if the employee is “rehireable” or not.

    IE: the only persons (HR) even remotely allowed to give out info about me are 0% likely to fill out the Checkster form -once again- because it violates company policy, leaving me in the lurch. Even if they were allowed to do so, they didn’t work WITH me and so would be unable to honestly answer the questionnaire anyway.

    If any thought at all is given to the answers, providing them to the DOZENS of questions will take WAY more than the 5 minute time frame promised. Much more likely to take 20 to 30 minutes which makes the chances of replies even MORE remote proving Chectster to be disingenuous from the start. Also, now that I have read the terms (as the gentleman above mentioned) I can only say wow that is some creepy stuff! Looking into people’s browser history and tracing IP’s- you have to be kidding me! They even admit to it, makes the old East German Stasi look quaint by comparison. Watch the movie “The Lives of Others” for reference- only it’s your PC doing the spying- no need for the guy in your attic.

    I have worked very hard and very honestly all my life yet I may yet be unable to find a livelihood (with at least one company) because of Checkster. Obviously they could care less about the little guy getting screwed but their clients should also be aware that they are being forced to cull even possibly the best, skilled workers without even knowing the REAL reasons behind that circumstance.

One Trackback

  1. [...] dagen geleden schreef John Sumser een interessant stukje over Checkster; een site waar je een referentiecheck voor een sollicitant kan laten uitvoeren. Waarbij met name de [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>